I was somewhat shocked to discover that you still have a career after coming across your ignorant, vile and derogatory rant about Gypsy and Traveller communities in Closer magazine. This shock, however, was short lived when I remembered that, as you point out, there is one rule for us and one rule for the rest of society. Nonetheless, I am still rather bewildered as to why you feel so hard done by, thus, I would like to highlight to you the special privileges that you, as a rich, white and successful celebrity, are missing out on by not being part of a Gypsy or Traveller community.
Under the Race Relations Act 1976, Gypsy and Traveller
communities are recognised as ethnic minorities, thus, supposedly should be
protected from discrimination. I guess you find this very unfair – why should a
bunch of delinquents who decided to live in caravans be entitled to these extra
rights that the hard working white tax payer doesn’t get? Maybe if you bought a
caravan and became a Gypsy then you would also be able to bask in the privileges
that the Race Relations Act supposedly brings, such as: being refused registration
at your local GP surgery; being refused service from pubs and restaurants;
being forced to deny your identity so you are not bullied at school or refused
employment; and being refused planning permission whether it be on the green
belt, a remote mountain peak or the moon.
What more could Gypsy and Traveller communities want? All
these extra privileges and still they have to snatch away the very few
pleasures that the rest of society are given, such as cricket pitches, village
greens, playing fields and the roadside. Of the 19,413 Gypsy and Traveller
caravans in England, 84% are on authorised sites while 16% on unauthorised sites.
Under the Housing Act 1996, a person is considered homeless if they have accommodation
but “there is no place where he is
entitled or permitted both to place it and to reside in it”. Therefore, any
Gypsy or Traveller living on an unauthorised site can be considered homeless.
The Coalition government have withdrawn funding for and repealed targets to
provide sites for Gypsy and Traveller communities whilst introducing greater
powers for local authorities to challenge unauthorised developments. This was
introduced in spite of the fact that there is a widely documented pitch
shortage. In Preston, the home of the Hoghton Cricket Club whom you speak of so
fondly of, there are an estimated 111 Gypsies and Travellers but just 14
pitches. The presence of unauthorised sites, thus, is hardly surprising.
But what
about the people “who pay their taxes and work hard to keep their homes
and villages nice”? Why should they be subjected to the injustice of having
homeless people living in their white middle class villages? Why can’t Gypsies
and Traveller just live in houses like everyone else? Turns out, that around one half to two thirds of Gypsies
and Travellers are living in bricks and mortar accommodation. If you would like
the rest of us to join them then we will happily ditch centuries of nomadic
tradition and move in next door to you and your hard working neighbours Carol.
Oh wait, that’s right, you wouldn’t want the likes of me living next door to
you would you? So where should we go? Should we only ‘invade’ the not so “pristine”
parks situated in council estates, after all, as long as we’re not leaving
behind “faeces” on the precious cricket pitches of middle class villages, does
it really matter? Or do you simply want the “Gypsy problem” to disappear as
Hitler advocated during WWII when he murdered 500,000 Romani Gypsies, including
members of my own family.
The truth is that
you are entirely correct. There is one
rule for Gypsies and Travellers and one rule for everyone else, except it is
your rule that comes crammed with extra privileges. Gypsies and Travellers are
hated not because they ‘invade’ fields and cricket pitches, but because they
have been a hugely maligned and despised minority since their arrival to Europe
and the UK, centuries ago. They have been subjected to slavery, extermination,
sterilisation, segregation both geographically and in education, evictions,
poverty, hate crime, and the criminalisation of their entire culture. In spite
of this, the rest of society wonders why we remain so resistant to
assimilation. The sad truth is that despite Hitler’s attempted extermination of
Europe’s Romani community, attitudes towards Gypsy and Traveller communities
have not changed but instead have remained hostile and prejudiced. "Discrimination against gypsies and travellers appears to be the last 'respectable' form of racism” and
goes without the same level of outrage that racism towards other ethnic
minorities receives. Had your column included a similar article about any other
ethnic minority, I am certain that you would be surrounded by shame and scandal.
Perhaps then Carol, you are a very lucky that there is one rule for Gypsies and
Travellers and one rule for everyone else, as if there wasn’t your career would
certainly be over.
Yours sincerely,
Pip
Borev.
